平价好看又舒适，有哪些睡衣店铺可以分享一下？
我们在购买睡衣的时候，主要追求的就是"舒适"两个字。作为家居服，舒适感是必不可少的。平价舒适的睡衣能给我们的睡眠生活带来很多幸福感，我就买过不少。平价好看舒适的睡衣店铺，我推荐的5家是：千线艺、PJMarshmellow、魔法圈圈、马克公主、贝妍旗舰店。平价舒适好看睡衣店铺top5:一：千线艺参考价格：62-219元推荐指数：★★★★★推荐理由：我在这家买过3件睡衣，妈妈也被我种草了这家的睡衣。这家多日韩风，偏传统简约，款式很多，像模特这类型的氧气小姐姐应该会喜欢，没有特殊的风格爱好的选这家就很不错。二：Rosetree参考价格：59-289元推荐指数：★★★★推荐理由：这家会多一点设计感，有自己的主题元素，是仙女风，睡裙款式特别多，很受欢迎，有长款有短款。以网纱、雪纺、蕾丝、棉、莫代尔为主要材质，有轻盈的舒适感。款式新颖，是我闺蜜的最爱！三：魔法圈圈参考价格：59-85元推荐指数：★★★★推荐理由：这家大多是甜美公主风，也有蛮多日式和服、汉服古风款式，有蕾丝和公举情绪的可以试一试性价比不错～我大学时期最爱的就是这家啦，我和舍友一起团购了好几次，穿着舒服又好看，价格还不贵。四：马克公主参考价格：58-188元推荐指数：★★★推荐理由：实穿性蛮强的少女俏皮家居服，粉色系和闺蜜款特别多，姐妹装或宿舍好友穿起来会很养眼，也有情侣款，男士睡衣都可以在这家买到。五：贝妍旗舰店参考价格：57-256元推荐指数：★★★推荐理由：休闲的感觉，不挑身材，特别多情侣款，是有对象的姐妹们的首选～四季款式都有，在这家店就可以买全啦～小贴士：我最最推荐的还是千线艺家的睡衣哦，可以选自己最喜欢的一款买来试试～
这句英文什么意思？
此题是一个选择问句。
be culture smart or be science intelligent?是要文化所带来的聪慧，还是要科学带来的智能？culture用来强调smart的方式。be smart, be culture smart。同理 ，science是intelligent的方式，be intelligent, be science intelligent.
例文4篇，仅供参考---
1.
Good afternoon，ladies and gentlemen，distinguished guests and honorable judges:
I’m xxxfrom E810. It is my great honour to share my viewpoints on Culture Smart or Science Intelligent with you.
This question resemble Mother or Fanther, who do you like better. Most of us will chose mother, when we were young, we always song Mum Is The Best In The World told us.
Here I wnna make an analogy, Let’s likened Culture Smart to Mother, likened Science Intelligent to father.
Formerly, as is the nature’s call:we like mother for almost five thousand years, she gives us the most long-standing history of civilization in the world. It is no exaggeration to say that the culture of our country is the most brilliant in the world. as it turned out, we have a great distance between our father Science Intelligent.Therefore he give us only the four great inventions of ancient China, which included powder ,compass, papaermaking, and printing,moreover, we didn’t make full use of it,
On the contrary, our brother western countries are fond of father Science Intelligent obviously, Because father gives them many technology which helped them become developed country.
Meanwhile we are always proud of our culture,For example, our abundant cultural deposits which made our civilization like a shining star in the darkness. When people mentioned about the human civilization, we have to refer to our China, because Chinese culture is the most historical and brilliant culture in the world.
But, by the way our technology has get far behind the western countries.
Unfortunately,one day, They attacked us with our own invention powder .our father sent his sons western countries to give us a good beating, because if we fall behind,we will be punished by those who are one-up. we do nothing about it, because what we have is just culture,rather than defence of hign technology.
Evidently ,god is fair, God closed a door and will open another window for you.
Here I wanna share a story that my history teacher told me. Once upon a time, There was a couple, they had two children ,the elder brother liked reading, he could acquire much knowledge from books in his study ,the younger brother was a behaviourist, no matter what kinds of problems in front of him, he will take action to solve it, all he believed was that the practice is the sole criterion for testing truth. So he made a plan to travel around the world, Decades years past, they both became adults ,the elder brother had become a teacher at his hometown (at the local) ,He tought Confucian culture for many children. He imparted knowledge and culture to people, However, his younger brother came back home with many manual skills, for example he learned how to make gizmos, such as windmill which helped the local farmers in Irrigating crop fields, and the round wheels which made transportation more convenient and so on.
All right, Let's keep on track. Culture Smart or Science Intelligent like these two brothers, who is better? The answer is both are good, They are as close as two siblings, two brother can never be divided.
2.
Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen: thanks for raising your attention. It’s a pleasure for me to share my point of view of the topic with you all. Well ,the topic I’m going to deal with is “culture smart or science intelligent”.
When the topic first caught my eye , the great artist Leonardo Da Vinci occurred to me . As is known to all, Leonardo has a gift for the paining, so there are many famous painting works drawn by him which are really impressive ,such as the well-known portrait Mona Lisa, however , he is not only an artist ,but a great inventor and a scientist. Everything he saw , heard , or experienced was an opportunity to learn something new, in another word , everything fascinated him. Therefore , according to his notebook , we found many inventions that were full of imagination and some theories about optics , which did help Leonardo’s paintings to be more vivid. So , I believe that the culture and science can be compatible, rather than an alternative.
As far as I’m concerned , the intelligent one in science may be a clever one , while the smart one in culture might be wisdom. Someone once said , the elimination of culture leads to the disappearance of civilization, this proves that we need the guidance of culture smart . On one hand , the culture provides ideological power to science and technology , on the other hand , culture prevents the tendency of extremity of science and technology . Nevertheless, there’s no doubt that the science and technology take the supreme lead of the productivity. Without the advanced science and technology , no achievements or progress would be made .What the distinctive feature of science is its commitment to an open-ended exploration. Then , my conclusion is the science and culture are not antagonistic, instead , they’re the complement.
Life is a multiple-choice exam , so I believe the answer is not an only certain thing. I’d like to compare the science to the composition of a painting , while the culture to the color of the painting ; the science is just like the heart , and the culture is our mind. Culture motivate science , and science develop culture.
3.How often have we not been told that the study of physical science is incompetent to confer culture; that it touches none of the higher problems of life; and, what is worse, that the continual devotion to scientific studies tends to generate a narrow and bigoted belief in the applicability of scientific methods to the search after truth of all kinds ? How frequently one has reason to observe that no reply to a troublesome argument tells so well as calling its author a "mere scientific specialist." And, as I am afraid it is not permissible to speak of this form of opposition to scientific education in the past tense; may we not expect to be told that this, not only omission, but prohibition, of "mere literary instruction and education" is a patent example of scientific narrow-mindedness?
I think that we must all assent to the first proposition. For culture certainly means something quite different from learning or technical skill. It implies the possession of an ideal, and the habit of critically estimating the value of things by comparison with a theoretic standard. Perfect culture should supply a complete theory of life, based upon a clear knowledge alike of its possibilities and of its limitations.
What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture
What Science Offers the Humanities examines some of the deep problems facing current approaches to the study of culture. It focuses especially on the excesses of postmodernism, but also acknowledges serious problems with postmodernism's harshest critics. In short, in order for the humanities to progress, its scholars need to take seriously contributions from the natural sciences-and particular research on human cognition-which demonstrate that any separation of the mind and the body is entirely untenable. The author provides suggestions for how humanists might begin to utilize these scientific discoveries without conceding that science has the last word on morality, religion, art, and literature. Calling into question such deeply entrenched dogmas as the "blank slate" theory of nature, strong social constructivism, and the ideal of disembodied reason, What Science Offers the Humanities replaces the human-sciences divide with a more integrated approach to the study of culture.
Technology and Culture have both influenced each other equally. Technology has been directed as an improvement in our lives, but on the other hand, Culture has been present in every invention, noticeable or not, and advancement in our evolving society. Technology is becoming focused upon more and more everyday, but culture is the determining factor that decides if there is a necessity for an improvement. There are endless views and perspectives that this situation can be viewed from, but without a doubt, Technology and Culture shape one another. Culture has been a part of our society, and way of life, forever. It is almost impossible to come up with an idea that isnt influenced by culture. Picture our lives without cars, television, and computers. This would be an example of everyday life without technology. People could function happily in that type of atmosphere, but technology has changed our lives forever. Technology has changed our pace and perspective on education. Students would have to go to libraries and spend a lot of time researching to find out information for class assignments, but with technology students can find almost anything on there home computers and by accessing the internet. Technology has definitely become the authoritative factor in our lives, but culture has shaped technology. Technology is made and used in such a variety of ways because many people who use the technology of today come from all walks of life and have different necessities, so to compensate for that technology must adapt to all different cultures.
4.
Culture Smart or Science Intelligent
Good evening，ladies and gentlemen，distinguished guests and honorable judges:
It is my great honour to share my viewpoints on Culture Smart and Science Intelligence with all of dear audience present.
As is known to us all that our contemporary lives and the society in current are undergoing profound changes with the promoting development of science and technology. However, have we realized the estrange and departure of our culture against the background on which the positive achievements have been brought by science and technology. Which course should we take in culture smart and science intelligence as the issue on social development is concerned in the process of ultrahigh-speeded urbanization? My viewpoint is clear an firm, that is the cultue smart.
It is generally accepted by the broad mass that science and technology take the supreme lead of the productivity. No achievements nurtured by civilization in our contemporary society can be created without the development of science and technology and the society will fall to its stagnant pace. Thanks to the progress made by the advancing science and technology, especially the development of intelligentization, schemed out by robots, unmanned driving and digital platform, offers great convienience to both the production and daily lives of human beings and promotes the social progress.
But under no circumstances should we admit that a series of problems on environment and social ethics concerning environment pollution, ozonocavity, greenhouse effect, colon human and nuclear deterrent occurred against the prosperity carried out by science and technology. So how can we spare no effort on keeping such problems from deterioration in all possibilities? What development pattern will be on science and technology in future?
The answer is that we need the guidance of culture smart. When we talk about culture, we may regard it as the tradition and history, but how can the intelligentization of science and technology be guided by the culture smart? Here I want to put it that culture is not like a pond filled with stagnant water, but a dynamic system. We can never draw a conclusion of culture as “the deposit of history”, what’s more, we should make it clear that the culture defines our present and future. Modernization, of any kind or shape, shares no alteration on its starting point but the commencement of culture. If not the modernization will inevitably fall to the situation where the water has no source and the tree has no root. The development of science and technology takes no exception on this.
The ultrahigh speed of the development of contemporary science and technology contributes no efforts on science and technology itself, but the ideological motivation and the promotion spurred by the ideological power offerd by culture smart. Karl Poopper once said, the elimination of culture leads to the disappearance of civilization. It is obviously that if the promotion effect had been omitted, the science and technology could have been far-reached.
The culture smart guides our society into stability and prosperity. We need culture smart because on the one hand, culture provides ideological power to science and technology, on the other hand, culture prevents the tendency of extremity of science and technology. The current problem concerning colon human, outerspace utilitization and nuclear weapon byproducted by contemporary science and technology call for the development in a just course on the sphere of culture. The wisdom-vacanted culture and the extremized science and technology will throw a great threat to the survival of us human beings and the world peace.
So, ladies and gentlemen, I think that the culture wisdom is our “root” and we need the root that supports our belief, the negation of the root casts its reflections on history and the existence of us human beings. So only in the manner of settling on the basis of culture smart can we make it helpful to the development of science and technology in a just course, the continual progress of human society, the prosperity and peace.
Thank you!
Both science itself, and the human culture of which it is a part, would benefit from a story of science that encourages wider engagement with and participation in the processes of scientific exploration. Such a story, based on a close analysis of scientific method, is presented here. It is the story of science as story telling and story revising. The story of science as story suggests that science can and should serve three distinctive functions for humanity: providing stories that may increase (but never guarantee) human well-being, serving as a supportive nexus for human exploration and story telling in general, and exemplifying a commitment to skepticism and a resulting open-ended and continuing exploration of what might yet be. Some practical considerations that would further the development and acceptance of such a story of science as a widely shared nexus of human activity are described.
Culture Smart or Science Intelligent?
Science and Culture
What is science? How does it relate to our lives as individual human beings? to other aspects of our social and cultural communities?
What is our future? ...our own role in and responsibility for the future? Can empirical inquiry help with such questions?
How does empirical understanding relate to other kinds of understanding? Are they necessarily antagonistic or can they usefully complement one another?
Division and specialization of function – science school and culture school
The intention is to retain traditional methods of teaching science, but to adjust the quantity of this kind of rigorous education to the abilities and attitudes of the student. This implies that it would be more educationally efficient for weaker students to spend just one or two hours per day learning science in a rigorous and ‘didactic’ classroom situation than to spend much longer in less-structured forms of classroom experience. At least, it is known from extensive experience (with elite students) that traditional methods are an effective and efficient way of teaching science.
A general understanding of efficiency in systems suggests some principles which would be likely to lead to greater science education efficiency. Perhaps the most frequent way in which human (and biological) systems are able to increase their efficiency is the principle of ‘division of labour’ which was first articulated by the economist Adam Smith. Division of labour increases the complexity of organization by specialization of function, and coordination of these specialized functions. Smith’s famous example involved a pin factory, in which the procedure for making a pin was broken down into numerous simpler, more-specialized sequential steps; and these steps were coordinated by managers leading to vastly increased efficiency (as measured by the numbers of pins produced per person per day) [8].
When the modern school is examined in this light, it can be seen that there is already considerable specialization. For example teachers are specialized according to age of children taught, subject matter expertise, and administrative responsibilities. Schools are also internally specialized by age stratification and academic aptitude of students (also, sometimes, by the sex or socio-economic class of students). However, logically there is a further possible division of function. My proposal is that the efficiency of science teaching might be increased by introducing a functional division between science education, and what might be termed cultural education - which would include arts, sports, ethics, social aspects of schooling and any other educational objectives such as good citizenship.
Schools might have an internal functional division into ‘science school’ and ‘culture school’. This functional division should be reflected in terms of physical plant, separate administrative structures, and the recruitment of differently-specialized teaching personnel. These divisions would be characterized by the nature of their system-characteristic internal evaluations. For instance, the evaluations within science school would be relatively narrow and more examination-focused than in the culture school. In science school the performance of both teaching staff and students would be judged mainly (although not exclusively) by scientific criteria, including formal examination results. Science school would be distinguished by its academic ethos and scholarly expectations. The focus of science school would be to inculcate the aptitude for abstract systematic cognition.
For example, an existing school might become physically divided between science and cultural parts, each on distinct parts of the campus. Each student would spend some significant part of each day (depending on their aptitude and motivation) in the ‘science school’, experiencing a traditional-style, didactic, disciplined and rigorous academic education which is (so far as we can tell) the best way to teach real science at the basic level. Science school teaching would need to be stratified according to ability and aptitude, since this is more efficient than teaching widely-mixed classes. Different strata of students could be taught from a broadly common curriculum (enabling educational credit accumulation and transfer); but different abilities of student would cover different amounts of subject matter, different specific subjects, and progress at different speeds.
The remainder of the students’ time at school would be spent in the cultural division, which would focus on broader aspects, and aiming to generate a more rounded and social individual. Examinations in culture school would be much more based on participation, sustained effort, attitudes, attendance etc. Inevitably, since it has many aims and a wider focus, culture school would apply many evaluations to its teachers and students. Inevitably, too, these evaluations would be less clear-cut and more contested.
睡衣谁家的好
1.芬腾睡衣中国十大家居品牌之一，作为“高品质五好家居服”创导者，芬腾参与家居服国家标准制定，专业提供亲肤、舒适、透气、耐用、环保的家居服和内衣全品类产品。推荐理由：特别喜欢穿这款棉睡衣家居服，冷天从外面回来换上暖暖的睡衣，瞬间感觉被温暖包围心情也变好起来了，穿上舒适透气，手摸在上面顺滑，尺寸大小也标准。【摘要】
睡衣谁家的好【提问】
1.芬腾睡衣中国十大家居品牌之一，作为“高品质五好家居服”创导者，芬腾参与家居服国家标准制定，专业提供亲肤、舒适、透气、耐用、环保的家居服和内衣全品类产品。推荐理由：特别喜欢穿这款棉睡衣家居服，冷天从外面回来换上暖暖的睡衣，瞬间感觉被温暖包围心情也变好起来了，穿上舒适透气，手摸在上面顺滑，尺寸大小也标准。【回答】
2、浪莎（LangSha）睡衣是大浪淘沙浓缩谐音。两字各10笔画，传达的是“十全十美”的服务和塑造完美的心愿。“浪”和“莎”字皆带“水”字旁，中国易经八卦谓之水中“财”。推荐理由：衣服的触感很好。尺码合适，穿着稍微宽松很舒服。厚度够，很暖和，北方的冬天也能穿出去。【回答】
3、猫人（MiiOW）睡衣公司旗下现有猫人经典“Miiow Classic”、猫人秘密“Miiow Secret”、猫人优品、猫人大时尚、猫人新锐家纺、猫人潮流鞋品、猫人母婴等多个子品牌分别面向不同层次的目标消费人群。推荐理由：男士睡衣，秋冬季长袖珊瑚绒，加厚加绒冬款，大码法兰绒，保暖棉袄连帽，卡通家居服，冬天套装，可外穿 ，质量很好。【回答】
粤语歌曲翻译谐音中文是什么？
请问是哪首歌？粤语流行歌曲，一般指香港的用粤语（广东话）唱的流行曲，由于香港的原创作曲家是广东人，又叫广东歌。一般所指是近代的“粤语流行音乐”。香港自1970年代起，由莲花乐队主音歌手许冠杰所带动的一股潮流，其后蓬勃发展的粤语流行歌曲；这一定义亦正符合了大部分1970年代或以后出生的香港人对“粤语流行歌曲”的认知范围。一如其他流行音乐，粤语流行歌曲是一种商品；一种反映某段时期社会面貌和价值观的商品。一般说法流行曲源于1950年代初期，但确切的源头仍然莫衷一是，有着不同的说法。惟初期的粤语流行曲脱胎自粤曲中的小曲，乃不争的事实。小曲是传统粤剧的过场谱子，除原有的广东谱子外，大量套用易于上口及流行的国语时代曲、欧西流行曲以至外省民歌，填上粤语曲词，以粤曲的唱腔及配乐出现。
这首粤语歌叫什么
这首粤语歌叫什么 香港组合 SOLER 版本的, 原唱是徐小凤 麦浚龙 还你门匙 你找的是； 认命(TVB剧集 银楼金粉 主题曲) 作曲：邓智伟 填词：张美贤 编曲：Johnny Yim 监制：邓智伟 主唱：王菀之 featuring 薛家燕 天荒地老 最好忘记 笑也轻微 痛也轻微 生老病死 相聚分离 身不由己 心不由己 曾经我不太相信定了宿命 曾经我想去反抗命中注定 如果我感觉心跳没法安静 谁愿听 在岁月里飘和沉 是我的命运 无望中哑忍 痛苦中偷生 用爱换最伤教训 妄想走近 因此生出了遗憾 曾想过不顾一切另创天地 曾经你想抱紧我最终退避 转载来自 ※Mojim. 魔镜歌词网 如果我可以改变就勇敢地 留住你 浮萍落花 颠沛流离 山盟海誓 力竭筋疲 笑饮砒霜 魄散魂离 爱有尽时 恨无绝期 在岁月里飘和沉 是我的命运 无望中哑忍 痛苦中偷生 用爱换最伤教训 妄想走近 因此生出了遗憾 梦会自最光变暗 让爱转做恨 流下的眼泪 是我不甘心 让恬静惹起微尘 我不安份 根本不应该发生 曾想过不顾一切另创天地 曾经你想抱紧我最终退避 如果我可以改变就勇敢地 忘掉你 是这首歌： 胡定欣&黎耀祥 - 日月 （《大太监》电视剧片尾曲）。 搜寻范围实在太大了，至少是男声还是女声都应该记得吧 会不会是这首？ 歌曲：唱歌 歌手：at17 专辑：meow meow meow 曲:林二汶 词:林二汶 编:林二汶 浮云骤似天使又似幽灵 天气是我今日心情 未能让思絮安静 还是情愿唱首歌 di di da di di da di da da di di da di di da da di da da di di da di di da da di di di di da 平淡唱首歌 花蕊上有彩蝶娉婷 为何蝴蝶讨厌就似苍蝇 双眼倦了好像失明 未曾觅花开丰盛 情愿胡乱唱首歌 di di da di di da di da da di di da di di da da di da da di di da di di da da di di di di da 麻木唱首歌 声音唱到沙哑了喝雪碧 天空变了灰色听细雨淅沥 寻寻觅觅冷冷清凄惨戚戚 ya hoo di di da di di da di da da di di da di di da da di da da di di da di di da da di di di di da 无力唱歌 di di da di di da di da da di di da di di da da di da da di di da di di da da di di di di da 刘德华的"十七岁"啊.. 你这个歌的格式网盘播不了，又太大了44M要下载才能听到，你不如先试试转换格式，否则大家很难做答的。 粤语流行歌曲，一般指香港的用粤语（广东话）唱的流行曲，由于香港的原创作曲家是广东人，又叫广东歌。一般所指是近代的“粤语流行音乐”，香港自1970年代起，由莲花乐队主音歌手许冠杰所带动的一股潮流，其后蓬勃发展的粤语流行歌曲；这一定义亦正符合了大部分1970年代或以后出生的香港人对“粤语流行歌曲”的认知范围。一如其他流行音乐，粤语流行曲是一种商品；一种反映某段时期社会面貌和价值观的商品。 一听就知道是卫兰的《拍错拖》啦，wish新曲加精选第二版专辑里就有，可以去mule搜搜看,还有谷歌音乐
